00:00:00/ —
Page Up and Page Down move to the next and the previous section.
- BEFORE AGENDA, from 00:00:00
- AGENDA, from 01:15:34
The Council will consider a once-off debt remission and proposed grant to Atlantis Special Economic Zone in terms of Section 17(3) of the Municipal Finance Management Act.
The item concerns a once-off write-off ("remission") of money the Atlantis Special Economic Zone (SEZ) owes the City, plus a proposed grant to the zone. Atlantis is a industrial area north of Cape Town. It was designated as a green-technology SEZ to attract manufacturing and renewable-energy investment, and to create jobs in an area with high unemployment. As I recall, SEZs are set up under the national Special Economic Zones Act 16 of 2014. They are run by licensed operators and get incentives such as tax relief and support for infrastructure. Municipal debts can build up when land, rates or service charges are owed before the zone's operations generate income. I could not confirm the specific amounts or the history of this debt from available sources.
The legal framework is the Municipal Finance Management Act 56 of 2003 (MFMA). Section 17(3) lists the documents that must accompany a municipal budget. This includes particulars of proposed allocations or grants to organisations or bodies. Grants-in-aid are described as discretionary financial assistance made by a municipality to an organisation or body, as referred to in section 17(3)(j)(iv) of the MFMA. Under section 15, a municipality may spend money only in terms of an approved budget. A debt write-off or grant therefore needs a formal council resolution and a transparent budget basis. Writing off debt also affects the City's revenue and its reported collection performance.
This matters to residents because a remission and grant use public money and forgo revenue that could fund other services. They could also support investment and jobs at one of the City's main economic development projects. The MFMA's transparency requirements let the public scrutinise whether the decision is lawful, affordable and in the public interest.
No speaker statements